Thursday, February 09, 2006

Twenty Questions (or thereabouts)

Who decided that…

… gatherings of believers are best done in an auditorium?

… unsalted crackers and grape juice are an appropriate substitute for sharing a meal?

…believers are best organized in groups of hundreds or even thousands, called “churches”?

…a message is a critical component of each gathering of believers?

… the best way for believers to understand God’s word is for only one person to speak to a group of hundreds or even thousands, once a week, for year after year?

…nobody else has anything worthwhile to say in a gathering, at least not for an extended period of time?

…nobody should ask questions or comment during a message or sermon?

…the theologically educated “know” more about God and Christian spirituality than those who actually in the "world" in secular jobs?

…worship as music is more important than worship through art, drama, poetry, or literature?

…gatherings of Christians should last an hour to an hour and a half, no more, no less?

…attending a weekly gathering in an auditorium is the primary thing that determines whether you are a legitimate Christian?

…the way the worship gathering is organized and executed is the central purpose of a church, worthy of more attention (and, often, money) than any other activity?

…to be a church, you have to have a building?

…before or after you attend a gathering in an auditorium, it is important that you be part of a “class”, which provides an educational process to learn more about the bible?

…small groups are optional, if you have time, can get around to it, and are successful in becoming accepted into a group?

…the best way to accomplish God’s mission is to start a program, form a committee, select a chairperson, get permission for what you’re doing from a church leader (or leaders), and then talk the whole issue to death before doing anything?

…the best way for a group of believers to be effective is to identify a goal and have an “event” that tries to meet that goal (worship, revival, bible study, Promise Keepers, etc.)?

…the primary purpose of paid staff is to minister to the believers who pay their salaries (and their family members), rather than to those in the community who are in need?

…its appropriate for a church budget to devote most resources to internal church issues (such as worship, staff, youth and children programs, buildings, parking lots, etc.) rather than on ministering to those in need?

…to be a part of a gathering of believers, everyone has to intellectually assent to the same set of ideas about various theologically-related topics?

Just wondering.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

Ah, the joys of being in a movement that does not value, or even acknowledge, our historical development. Ah, the dangers of a movement perceiving themselves as having sprung, fully-formed, from the foreheads of Peter, Paul, John and the rest.

The answers to these questions are why I love church history...seeing how the church has changed, developed, responded, critiqued, etc. the world around them, and constantly tried to be the body of Christ.

7:40 AM  
Blogger James said...

While I'm sure many answers to these questions exist in church history **nod to greg** ....

Rhetorically speaking, I ask myself these questions probably on a weekly basis.

Thanks for writing them down Matt!

8:13 AM  
Blogger Matt said...

This is a good discussion. I am interested in it because - as Greg pointed out - without knowing a lot about church history, you really can't see how we got where we are (and/or whether its a good place or a bad place). Its just the way we DO them.

I think its important to honor those who have gone before us in history, learning from their success (and mistakes). I'm grateful for folks who are educated in that way, so that they can help guide us.

I also think its important to think of what we are doing as a progression - part of a story. So, how we "do" church now may not be the way it was done in the past. The Kingdom advances, hopefully.

At this point in our history, the most important thing we can do is ask questions like these, acknowledge that things DON'T have to continue to be this way, and have conversations about what seems to be worth holding onto and what doesn't.

3:57 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home